I.mean the emotion driven policies (nice ideas) with which the left identifies, are more important to the left than are sound policies. And the emotional policies propagate threats to a sound society.
Technically the state Constitutional provision is not linked to ranked-choice voting, but that is essentially the argument in support being suggested by Diamondstone and explicitly endorsed by Zuck as "fair." You are correct -- it is a recipe for deterioration and distrust.
"Nice-sounding ideas often require critical analysis to perceive hidden threats."
It seems nice sounding ideas trump critical analysis in New England allowing hidden threats to thrive.
I'm unclear what you mean....
I.mean the emotion driven policies (nice ideas) with which the left identifies, are more important to the left than are sound policies. And the emotional policies propagate threats to a sound society.
Technically the state Constitutional provision is not linked to ranked-choice voting, but that is essentially the argument in support being suggested by Diamondstone and explicitly endorsed by Zuck as "fair." You are correct -- it is a recipe for deterioration and distrust.