So much for the standard argument I often hear, “It will never come to THAT….” It is a good day to wear my Ban Assault Vaccines t-shirt. Thank you for keeping us apprised.
It is a serious toss up between Ban Assault Vaccines and my Let’s Bring Wholesome Back t-shirts today. I am looking at having one printed that states “Let’s Bring Sanity Back”.
In Vermont a teacher is not allowed to touch a student. Student One is turning over tables and disrupting the classroom. Student One is not removed; the class is removed, then a "behavioral analyst " is summoned to verbally diffuse the situation before the class can resume. Student Two physically leaves the school building. A coded alert is announced and any available employee must join the search. When Student Two is located Student Two cannot be touched. Student two must be "talked" into returning to the school building. The two situations I detail here are everyday occurrences in each and every Vermont public school. So here's my question. If a student cannot be touched how can a school employee forcefully take a child from the classroom and forcefully administer a vaccination? The answer, of course, is this: the child is only six years old and cannot defend himself. I'm guessing that this school district did not try to force a vaccination on a 250 pound,16 year old "child" from the wrestling team. These "educators" are all cowards who prey on the weak and defenseless and are helped by equally cowardly courts.
(a) A person is guilty of simple assault if he or she:
(1) attempts to cause or purposely, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; or
(2) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or
(3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury.
But see, Mr. Klar pointed out to me in an email as did others, that bodily injury must take place and we all know that the vaccine is "safe". So, no harm can have been done.
And just for the record, the psychiatric institutions in the state have the same restrictions on all patients if they run away and are off the property. If hands on resolution occurs while on the property, copious amounts of paperwork and meetings occur afterwards. In all honesty, I don't actually disagree with this. But then to be able to touch a child when no behavior is causing imminent danger to the child or others, still seems egregious. And unlawful. And immoral. And unethical.
It's fake virtue. Many Vermonters seem to be inflicted by this need to "virtue signal" when what has become "mainstream" here, in fact, misplaced and mentally unbalanced. We have lost our collective minds. Good article. You hit on all the relevant points.
In a video from some months ago, Bishop Barron, head of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, went to see Governor Waltz regarding his sanctuary stance for children seeking mutilation. The congenial Bishop seemed baffled that the Governor looked at him as if he had two heads. When my Dem/Catholic family and fellow parishioners ask me how I can vote for Trump, I now have a biblical reply. You cannot be a devout Catholic believing in the sanctity of human life and support a transhumanist.
Once again, Vermont's "officials" (officious, evil snakes) want our State to be a mini-California in their progressivism.
I hope they don't start seizing children from their parents if a child expresses a desire to transition from their birth gender prior to the age of reason and legal ability to give informed consent. This is already the case with " gender-affirmibg care" castration and permanent surgical butchering happening in California. Abomination!
So it seems this must not go to the UaS Supreme Court, unless we soon get the entire corrupt, diseased system to go down.
It’s not only that the state has provided a refuge for kids seeking sex change against the parent’s wishes. The state is telling us that parents have NO parental rights, in or out of school. Coming next is mandatory in-person attendance at government schools, with no exemption for homeschooling. Parents that would dare instill attitudes in their children that dispute the government agenda will have their children removed from the home.
I think you are exactly correct. I was threatened with “jail” over attendance issues for my oldest daughter who had epilepsy that was very difficult to get under control and that was in 2010. I fought the “education” district tooth and nail. I pulled her out and engaged a home-hospital educator myself. But it was a battle. I am rather tired of threats of jail, in fact. I am well aware of the fact I do NOT live in a “free country”. Thankfully, I read a lot, learned to do my own legal work. That said, I have had to explain law to power-tripping corrupt judges. Had we collectively disregarded stupid mandates, which are not actual law in 2020, the whole thing would have fallen apart like a house of cards. I spoke to a group of Constitutionally-inclined women and told them that if they did not learn to push back, learn their rights, they would not even have “their children”. I stated on Night Court record in 2018, in a very sarcastic way, “I guess the NIH got bigger lab rats”….turns out I was correct. I also said, “FUBAR” on record as I was listed as Hispanic in their discovery when I am English (Mayflower Society, in fact, which means my ancestors came to the US to escape tyranny…the same tyranny we are under now) and that was a very stupid error on the part of “law enforcement”, one of many such errors. I have darkened corrupt politician’s office doorsteps by speaking to them face-to-face as emailing has ZERO EFFECT. People will not even have their children…..you are exactly correct.
We are going to have to behave as Ian Smith, the gym owner from New Jersey did if we do not want to be slaves. I could not be more serious. I removed all the stupid crime scene tape at our local parks that taxpayers pay for and disregarded every single mandate. I did it in front of CHILDREN so they could see what disregarding tyranny looks like.
Perhaps not. The 'jabber' was apparently very remorseful here. Though I understand your sentiment and the family is grateful for all your support.... :)
So much for the standard argument I often hear, “It will never come to THAT….” It is a good day to wear my Ban Assault Vaccines t-shirt. Thank you for keeping us apprised.
It is a serious toss up between Ban Assault Vaccines and my Let’s Bring Wholesome Back t-shirts today. I am looking at having one printed that states “Let’s Bring Sanity Back”.
In Vermont a teacher is not allowed to touch a student. Student One is turning over tables and disrupting the classroom. Student One is not removed; the class is removed, then a "behavioral analyst " is summoned to verbally diffuse the situation before the class can resume. Student Two physically leaves the school building. A coded alert is announced and any available employee must join the search. When Student Two is located Student Two cannot be touched. Student two must be "talked" into returning to the school building. The two situations I detail here are everyday occurrences in each and every Vermont public school. So here's my question. If a student cannot be touched how can a school employee forcefully take a child from the classroom and forcefully administer a vaccination? The answer, of course, is this: the child is only six years old and cannot defend himself. I'm guessing that this school district did not try to force a vaccination on a 250 pound,16 year old "child" from the wrestling team. These "educators" are all cowards who prey on the weak and defenseless and are helped by equally cowardly courts.
Ron, excellent point. I think it is Assault.
Title 13 : Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter 019 : Breach of the Peace; Disturbances
Subchapter 004 : Other Disturbances of the Peace
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 1023)
§ 1023. Simple assault
(a) A person is guilty of simple assault if he or she:
(1) attempts to cause or purposely, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; or
(2) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or
(3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury.
But see, Mr. Klar pointed out to me in an email as did others, that bodily injury must take place and we all know that the vaccine is "safe". So, no harm can have been done.
And just for the record, the psychiatric institutions in the state have the same restrictions on all patients if they run away and are off the property. If hands on resolution occurs while on the property, copious amounts of paperwork and meetings occur afterwards. In all honesty, I don't actually disagree with this. But then to be able to touch a child when no behavior is causing imminent danger to the child or others, still seems egregious. And unlawful. And immoral. And unethical.
Disgusting.
What happens to that poor kid if he develops turbo cancer or heart issues….. I’d loose my *+#%* if that happened to my family
It's fake virtue. Many Vermonters seem to be inflicted by this need to "virtue signal" when what has become "mainstream" here, in fact, misplaced and mentally unbalanced. We have lost our collective minds. Good article. You hit on all the relevant points.
In a video from some months ago, Bishop Barron, head of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, went to see Governor Waltz regarding his sanctuary stance for children seeking mutilation. The congenial Bishop seemed baffled that the Governor looked at him as if he had two heads. When my Dem/Catholic family and fellow parishioners ask me how I can vote for Trump, I now have a biblical reply. You cannot be a devout Catholic believing in the sanctity of human life and support a transhumanist.
Once again, Vermont's "officials" (officious, evil snakes) want our State to be a mini-California in their progressivism.
I hope they don't start seizing children from their parents if a child expresses a desire to transition from their birth gender prior to the age of reason and legal ability to give informed consent. This is already the case with " gender-affirmibg care" castration and permanent surgical butchering happening in California. Abomination!
So it seems this must not go to the UaS Supreme Court, unless we soon get the entire corrupt, diseased system to go down.
Bernie where are ya?!
It’s not only that the state has provided a refuge for kids seeking sex change against the parent’s wishes. The state is telling us that parents have NO parental rights, in or out of school. Coming next is mandatory in-person attendance at government schools, with no exemption for homeschooling. Parents that would dare instill attitudes in their children that dispute the government agenda will have their children removed from the home.
I think you are exactly correct. I was threatened with “jail” over attendance issues for my oldest daughter who had epilepsy that was very difficult to get under control and that was in 2010. I fought the “education” district tooth and nail. I pulled her out and engaged a home-hospital educator myself. But it was a battle. I am rather tired of threats of jail, in fact. I am well aware of the fact I do NOT live in a “free country”. Thankfully, I read a lot, learned to do my own legal work. That said, I have had to explain law to power-tripping corrupt judges. Had we collectively disregarded stupid mandates, which are not actual law in 2020, the whole thing would have fallen apart like a house of cards. I spoke to a group of Constitutionally-inclined women and told them that if they did not learn to push back, learn their rights, they would not even have “their children”. I stated on Night Court record in 2018, in a very sarcastic way, “I guess the NIH got bigger lab rats”….turns out I was correct. I also said, “FUBAR” on record as I was listed as Hispanic in their discovery when I am English (Mayflower Society, in fact, which means my ancestors came to the US to escape tyranny…the same tyranny we are under now) and that was a very stupid error on the part of “law enforcement”, one of many such errors. I have darkened corrupt politician’s office doorsteps by speaking to them face-to-face as emailing has ZERO EFFECT. People will not even have their children…..you are exactly correct.
We are going to have to behave as Ian Smith, the gym owner from New Jersey did if we do not want to be slaves. I could not be more serious. I removed all the stupid crime scene tape at our local parks that taxpayers pay for and disregarded every single mandate. I did it in front of CHILDREN so they could see what disregarding tyranny looks like.
Bravo?
If you need any help with any aspect of getting this to SCOTUS, please don't hesitate to contact me Mr. Klar.
If this were my child, I'd be in jail and the jabber would be in the hospital for some time.
Perhaps not. The 'jabber' was apparently very remorseful here. Though I understand your sentiment and the family is grateful for all your support.... :)
Well that's good, I guess. The physical harm to that child has likely not surfaced yet or he or she may be very fortunate. Praying for the latter.
No recourse for any psychological harm.....
Yes, I left that out.
This proves the point that our justice system has been bought of just like our Progressive, Democrat laden legislature!