Thanks for the comments. I agree with you. In fact, much like the vaccine science, I was initially persuaded by the so-called climate-science. But then both fell apart under logical scrutiny and real science (much like Critical Race Theory and Gender Theory). I smiled though that you noticed that I tied it to the vaccine issue, itself so volatile -- I was very deliberate in doing so, and I'm glad you see the connection. There is connection between all the bogus claims just recounted -- race, gender, sexualization of children (comprehensive sex ed "theory" says children are sexual beings from birth), climate change, and vaccines -- all are false; all seek to take power; all create divisions and destruction, as intended.
I would like some ketchup with this baloney sandwich.
So, the highly regulatory state of Vermont led the nation with the labelling of gmo ingredients on products. I was under the impression that this was because of health concerns!
This whole climate scheme boggles my mind.
We used to care about the whales, but now we zealously fund offshore windfarms that are killing the whales due to sonar that beaches the creatures.
We used to care about trash, but now we are consumed with carbon.
We used to care about protecting animals, and now peta is silent as animals are carbon culled.
We used to care about going back to nature, but now we completely distracted by the conveniences that technology can give us.
We are sacrificing independence and caring for our planet, each other, and other creatures for subservience and a misguided sense of immortality.
Amen!! I'm glad you and others are speaking out with common sense. I find it particularly revealing that those who claim they care about farm animals seek to kill them off. As you rightly say: "We used to care about protecting animals, and now peta is silent as animals are carbon culled." Good phrase---carbon culled. I hope you don't object to my borrowing that for future use. :)
Agree with Quantasee. "The exact degree of carbon dioxide destructiveness to the climate is similarly unknown...". I would posit that there is no issue with CO2. Just a convenient boogieman for the globalists to propagandise.
I agree, though I don't have to conclude that there is no issue with CO2 to see that the science is being abused, VERY CLEARLY. Similarly, regardless of whether shots work, COVID-19 very clearly came from a Wuhan lab and we were blatantly lied to; regardless of where the virus arose, the shots did not work as advertised, if at all, and were not safe. The list is long of the Orwellian lies we are fed. But people are becoming aware, and that truth will spread and dowse the lies.
Exactly. For the same reasons that we don't have to be "anti-vax" to conclude that the COVID vaccinations were pushed for unscientific and even anti-scientific reasons. In this and many other totalitarian schemes they haven't just not followed the science, they have gone completely against it for reasons that are only mysterious if we ignore their motives. This 21st-century Lysenkoism will end the same way as its 20th-century antecedent.
Safe and Effective! ( vaccines, glyphosate… ) The mantra of globalists angling for more financial control. Note how a certain B Gates touted this after he heavily invested in Pfizer, but then after he made billions in profit and the “vaccine” ( imho, a bio weapon, that is wolf is sheep’s clothing) was starting to be become public knowledge, obviously causing more harm than good , he sold much of his stock. I wonder how much stock he has now in Monsanto/Bayer ( Bayer… brought the world Xyclon B… never forget ).
The shamelessness seems to accompany a sense of impunity: it's as if these people do not fear reprisal or public accountability at all. As if We the People don't matter, because the media and government are complicit.
Unfortunately this is true. I once worked for M and witnessed first hand, how the environmental lawyers could easily buy favorable to M, legislation at the EPA. Then would be laughing over drinks later on in the bar….. when governments are captured by corporations, and increasingly consolidated corporations, then you have “public/private” partnerships, the real stake holders, which is not capitalism, but is rather by at least Mussolini’s definition, fascism.
What is the “carbon footprint” of making, selling, transporting and applying roundup? Does it just fall out of the skies? They never tell the whole story.
VeryVer, you have hinted at the tip of the pollution-generating Iceberg. What of shipping solar panels and lawn mowers from China? What of the uncounted cost in soil erosion when the soil microbes are destroyed, and soil erodes more rapidly? What of the water cost, when those depleted soils retain less of it, and pollution run-off increases? What of the rapid decline of insect life as well as microbial, upon both of which all human food supplies, and life itself, ultimately depend? Thank you for your comment -- we need more people to ask these questions, and demand answers from the "industry" (and WEF) which claim they are saving us.
Thanks for making the point that the same corporations pushing the poisons into our crops (and therefore our food supply) are the same ones pushing the vaccines.
I still maintain the entire premise that CO2 is a pollutant and some sort of tipping point is completely bogus, along with their computer models which lack any empirical proof and therefore are unscientific. No different than Fauci claiming that if you doubt him, you are a science denier. I don't doubt real scientific methodology, but I do doubt their science. Since the beginning of the plannedemic, my trust in big-pharma and big-ag has been irrevocably damaged. It all goes toward their inhumane global depopulation agenda. These people are evil.
Thanks for the comments. I agree with you. In fact, much like the vaccine science, I was initially persuaded by the so-called climate-science. But then both fell apart under logical scrutiny and real science (much like Critical Race Theory and Gender Theory). I smiled though that you noticed that I tied it to the vaccine issue, itself so volatile -- I was very deliberate in doing so, and I'm glad you see the connection. There is connection between all the bogus claims just recounted -- race, gender, sexualization of children (comprehensive sex ed "theory" says children are sexual beings from birth), climate change, and vaccines -- all are false; all seek to take power; all create divisions and destruction, as intended.
I would like some ketchup with this baloney sandwich.
So, the highly regulatory state of Vermont led the nation with the labelling of gmo ingredients on products. I was under the impression that this was because of health concerns!
This whole climate scheme boggles my mind.
We used to care about the whales, but now we zealously fund offshore windfarms that are killing the whales due to sonar that beaches the creatures.
We used to care about trash, but now we are consumed with carbon.
We used to care about protecting animals, and now peta is silent as animals are carbon culled.
We used to care about going back to nature, but now we completely distracted by the conveniences that technology can give us.
We are sacrificing independence and caring for our planet, each other, and other creatures for subservience and a misguided sense of immortality.
At great cost.
Amen!! I'm glad you and others are speaking out with common sense. I find it particularly revealing that those who claim they care about farm animals seek to kill them off. As you rightly say: "We used to care about protecting animals, and now peta is silent as animals are carbon culled." Good phrase---carbon culled. I hope you don't object to my borrowing that for future use. :)
Agree with Quantasee. "The exact degree of carbon dioxide destructiveness to the climate is similarly unknown...". I would posit that there is no issue with CO2. Just a convenient boogieman for the globalists to propagandise.
I agree, though I don't have to conclude that there is no issue with CO2 to see that the science is being abused, VERY CLEARLY. Similarly, regardless of whether shots work, COVID-19 very clearly came from a Wuhan lab and we were blatantly lied to; regardless of where the virus arose, the shots did not work as advertised, if at all, and were not safe. The list is long of the Orwellian lies we are fed. But people are becoming aware, and that truth will spread and dowse the lies.
Exactly. For the same reasons that we don't have to be "anti-vax" to conclude that the COVID vaccinations were pushed for unscientific and even anti-scientific reasons. In this and many other totalitarian schemes they haven't just not followed the science, they have gone completely against it for reasons that are only mysterious if we ignore their motives. This 21st-century Lysenkoism will end the same way as its 20th-century antecedent.
Safe and Effective! ( vaccines, glyphosate… ) The mantra of globalists angling for more financial control. Note how a certain B Gates touted this after he heavily invested in Pfizer, but then after he made billions in profit and the “vaccine” ( imho, a bio weapon, that is wolf is sheep’s clothing) was starting to be become public knowledge, obviously causing more harm than good , he sold much of his stock. I wonder how much stock he has now in Monsanto/Bayer ( Bayer… brought the world Xyclon B… never forget ).
The shamelessness seems to accompany a sense of impunity: it's as if these people do not fear reprisal or public accountability at all. As if We the People don't matter, because the media and government are complicit.
Unfortunately this is true. I once worked for M and witnessed first hand, how the environmental lawyers could easily buy favorable to M, legislation at the EPA. Then would be laughing over drinks later on in the bar….. when governments are captured by corporations, and increasingly consolidated corporations, then you have “public/private” partnerships, the real stake holders, which is not capitalism, but is rather by at least Mussolini’s definition, fascism.
Precisely. Regulatory capture is what has destroyed farmers and local farming as well.... It is indeed fascism, by any other name.
What is the “carbon footprint” of making, selling, transporting and applying roundup? Does it just fall out of the skies? They never tell the whole story.
VeryVer, you have hinted at the tip of the pollution-generating Iceberg. What of shipping solar panels and lawn mowers from China? What of the uncounted cost in soil erosion when the soil microbes are destroyed, and soil erodes more rapidly? What of the water cost, when those depleted soils retain less of it, and pollution run-off increases? What of the rapid decline of insect life as well as microbial, upon both of which all human food supplies, and life itself, ultimately depend? Thank you for your comment -- we need more people to ask these questions, and demand answers from the "industry" (and WEF) which claim they are saving us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiqkJTUIOBY
Thanks for making the point that the same corporations pushing the poisons into our crops (and therefore our food supply) are the same ones pushing the vaccines.
I still maintain the entire premise that CO2 is a pollutant and some sort of tipping point is completely bogus, along with their computer models which lack any empirical proof and therefore are unscientific. No different than Fauci claiming that if you doubt him, you are a science denier. I don't doubt real scientific methodology, but I do doubt their science. Since the beginning of the plannedemic, my trust in big-pharma and big-ag has been irrevocably damaged. It all goes toward their inhumane global depopulation agenda. These people are evil.