Of course, this is under the premise that carbon dioxide (CO2) is bad, more CO2 is worse, and somehow uniquely human generated CO2 drives Earth’s warming.
The hypothesis that CO2 dictates and controls Earth’s temperature must be scientifically valid to be true. The actual historical data and proxies show numerous times when CO2 and temperatures changed in opposite directions. Thus, the hypothesis is false.
Over the last 50 million years CO2 and temperature were negatively correlated (CO2 rose, temperatures fell or temperatures rose, CO2 fell) 42% of the time, and there was a glaring lack of recurring ratios, and “many ratios were zero or near zero.”
Over the last 1 million years “87% of the ratios were negative or zero or near zero.” This “directly contradicts the Climate Change-CO2 hypothesis.”
Water vapor dominates the greenhouse gas “warming” process.
As atmospheric CO2 levels continue slowly rising with more ocean outgassing of CO2 due to Earth’s warming we get the benefits in our crops. The Earth has 25+% more vegetation than 40 years ago due to improved plant growth and drought resistance from added CO2. The Earth has reached concerning low levels of CO2 during the current Inter-Glacial period. The CO2 added by mankind is a blessing, given the benefits to human and plant life.
The climate continues to change and we need to focus our time and money on adaptation/resilience.
I find that the "climate science" is better described as a "climate cult." The effort of this article is to sidestep that debate and prove something unequivocal which also jettisons that whole silly battle. Even IF the climate is warming by GHGs, current policies are far worse than doing nothing at all. The "real science" is incontrovertible.
What, THAT conspiracy theory (now being exposed as fact)? That worm, too, is turning against our would-be rulers and executioners. Let us sharpen our guillotines!
Of course, this is under the premise that carbon dioxide (CO2) is bad, more CO2 is worse, and somehow uniquely human generated CO2 drives Earth’s warming.
The hypothesis that CO2 dictates and controls Earth’s temperature must be scientifically valid to be true. The actual historical data and proxies show numerous times when CO2 and temperatures changed in opposite directions. Thus, the hypothesis is false.
Over the last 50 million years CO2 and temperature were negatively correlated (CO2 rose, temperatures fell or temperatures rose, CO2 fell) 42% of the time, and there was a glaring lack of recurring ratios, and “many ratios were zero or near zero.”
Over the last 1 million years “87% of the ratios were negative or zero or near zero.” This “directly contradicts the Climate Change-CO2 hypothesis.”
Water vapor dominates the greenhouse gas “warming” process.
As atmospheric CO2 levels continue slowly rising with more ocean outgassing of CO2 due to Earth’s warming we get the benefits in our crops. The Earth has 25+% more vegetation than 40 years ago due to improved plant growth and drought resistance from added CO2. The Earth has reached concerning low levels of CO2 during the current Inter-Glacial period. The CO2 added by mankind is a blessing, given the benefits to human and plant life.
The climate continues to change and we need to focus our time and money on adaptation/resilience.
I find that the "climate science" is better described as a "climate cult." The effort of this article is to sidestep that debate and prove something unequivocal which also jettisons that whole silly battle. Even IF the climate is warming by GHGs, current policies are far worse than doing nothing at all. The "real science" is incontrovertible.
It is a horrendous outcome that law considers science by vote. Science should be concerned with only the facts ma’am. Only the facts.
They don't even consider the effect that top secret purposeful human climate engineering has.
What, THAT conspiracy theory (now being exposed as fact)? That worm, too, is turning against our would-be rulers and executioners. Let us sharpen our guillotines!
https://grist.org/climate/skeptics-2/
We lawyers sTUdY FaCTs.
Yah. Facts, especially scientific facts, and more importantly, a deep immersion in the scientific method. Suite you do!
(I guess the climate skeptic nutcases have invaded substack. This is the third one I’d encountered in this evening’s feed.
Every single one of them betrayed a fundamental misunderstanding of the issue.
It goes to show that one can become proficient in a technical field such as law or engineering and still be a willing fool.