A Message for (and from) the WHO: We Won't be Fooled Again!

The WHO is off the rails, and still careening toward tyranny. I will not comply.

The United Nations, United States government, World Economic Forum (WEF) and World Health Organization (WHO) have so effectively destroyed public trust in their sketchy operations that if (when) they launch their next totalitarian scam, I will resist them from the outset with every resource at my human disposal. I will fight them with a sharpened stick if necessary: I will not comply.

(A typical idiotic shop-window sign during COVID).

This is not a posture I held at the beginning of the COVID pandemic: these entities have worked very hard to condition me against them. When the WHO, for example, has failed so completely to respond to COVID, why would anyone trust it with any oversight of anything at all? Would we put Joseph Hazelwood back on the Exxon Valdez for a repeat trip? A drunken sailor is more trustworthy than this globalist cabal.

Yet the WHO strives to influence or control a long list of social ills in the name of health: equity, environment, sexuality, abortion, wealth distribution, etc. In the case of COVID we saw the woke Social Justice WHO at the outset, not preventing a disease but purporting to redress all human sins. The WHO states in “Promoting a fair and equitable response to the COVID-19 Pandemic”:

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated social and health inequities and demonstrated how sex, gender and other social stratifiers (such as age, race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, geography, legal status and other health conditions) result in differential risks and outcomes of COVID-19. ….Some of these population groups have also been the targets of hate speech, discrimination and in some cases violence as a result of apparent blame for COVID-19, underscoring the need for a rights-based appr­­oach to COVID-19.

Apparently this is the “World Human Rights” organization, not merely Health. Good thing we have the WHO to regulate hate speech (and exterminate free speech) in America! But how could the WHO get speech right when it has failed on equity (and medical science) so abysmally. Citing gender as a social justice cause, WHO also includes a link to this study by Nature:

Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.47) compared to females. With few exceptions, the sex bias observed in COVID-19 is a worldwide phenomenon.

Has the WHO been advocating for male gender favoritism in treatment of COVID? If it can’t get gender right, how will it address the structural racism it claims exists (as usual, a priori)?:

More than two years since the first SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported, the COVID-19 pandemic remains an acute global emergency.

While many countries have successfully vaccinated significant portions of their populations, stark global inequities remain with imbalance in the global distribution of vaccines, and potential new variants could further threaten the ability of governments to recover from the inter-connected health, economic, and broader human rights crises. Within countries, the impact of COVID-19 has been disproportionately felt by populations experiencing structural racial- and ethnicity-based discrimination. ….these unequal impacts and human rights violations are not inevitable; neither is a spike in xenophobia and hate speech.

So the WHO that lies about vaccines and COVID now claims it will regulate xenophobia? Those disparate impacts of COVID seem to reflect the elitist disconnect of the WHO: how much “inter-connected health, economic, and broader human rights crises” were CREATED by the immoral, visibly corrupt plandemic response to COVID-19 of which the WHO was global orchestrator? The WHO inflicted great harm on marginalized communities, and now seeks to leverage that very perfidy into its Cause Celebre to do it again. This is a recurring pattern: the powerful weaponizing the vulnerable, to conquer all.

But we won’t be fooled again! My stick is sharpened: the WHO won’t ever stick me! If the U.S. government seeks to sacrifice my inalienable rights on the WHO altar, my stick will be pointed there too—I will die rather than submit. And I am not alone.

Many people who eagerly (fearfully) consented to the jab have seen the boldly dishonest claims rolled out by the WHO et al. This has been a surreal Orwell/Huxley novel inflicted upon billions. Let us not forget the litany of lies: about gain-of-function research; the origin of the virus; mortality rates; adverse reactions; that shots are “safe and effective” (they were neither); that natural immunity suddenly failed; that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were verboten; that children were at risk, or should be jabbed to protect the geriatric. Remember when Fauci said COVID immunization was just like measles immunization? These are all demonstrable, widespread, coordinated lies. Lies that directly caused the economic decline, alienation, and increased drug, depression, and suicide rates that the WHO now audaciously claims it will equitably cure.

The WHO has its sticky, unaccountable, bureaucratic fingers in every aspect of human society, including abortion (“to deliver life-saving care”) and sex education. After all, conditioning young children to enjoy sex is part of the expansive “health” agenda:

Sexual health-related issues are wide-ranging, and encompass sexual orientation and gender identity, sexual expression, relationships, and pleasure. ….Sexual rights protect all people's rights to fulfil and express their sexuality and enjoy sexual health. ….…a central aspect of being human throughout life encompasses sex, gender identities and roles, sexual orientation, eroticism, pleasure, intimacy and reproduction. Sexuality is experienced and expressed in thoughts, fantasies, desires, beliefs, attitudes, values, behaviours, practices, roles and relationships. While sexuality can include all of these dimensions, not all of them are always experienced or expressed. Sexuality is influenced by the interaction of biological, psychological, social, economic, political, cultural, legal, historical, religious and spiritual factors. (WHO, 2006a)

That’s a rather comprehensive list of future WHO jurisdiction: it will presumably regulate culture to regulate sex to regulate health to save the world. Talk about mission creep….

The WHO’s mission creep is decidedly creepy. It advocates sexualizing children with no age limit, invoking nebulous “rights” of children to be freed by the WHO-church from the stifling moral shackles of parents: children have rights independently of their parents, WHO claims, for “health” through “comprehensive” sex education:

Children and adolescents have the right to be educated about themselves and the world around them in an age- and developmentally appropriate manner – and they need this learning for their health and well-being.

Intended to support school-based curricula, the UN’s global guidance indicates starting CSE at the age of 5 when formal education typically begins. However, sexuality education is a lifelong process, sometimes beginning earlier, at home, with trusted caregivers.

This is just the tip of the colossal WHO iceberg, inexorably moving across nations to crush them like Titanics in port. If the WHO has displayed a complete corruption in handling the COVID pandemic, why would any sane human–let alone nation–trust this cadre of proven liars with yet more jurisdictional reach, and to oversee sex ed and gender hormone “therapies” as child entitlements? 

If the U.S. Congress defers to the WHO for future health guidance in a pandemic, the U.S. Congress has thereby abdicated completely its own legitimacy: if the WHO is our new master, then those who sold off the ranch and candy store sure as heck are not my elected reps, and have no recognizable authority over anything at all.

Yet this is precisely what is currently in the works. The WHO has redrafted their articles and platform, to appropriate to themselves yet greater powers—to direct, rather than advise. James Roguski has aptly warned of this escalation of unelected globalist control over American citizens, as has John Campbell. The writing is on the wall (and in the latest WHO drafts).

Interestingly, the iconic song “Won’t Get Fooled Again” by the rock band The Who was written in response to social justice agitators. Writer Pete Townsend claims he penned the song in response to an annoying effort by Abbie Hoffman to take the stage at Woodstock for personal political pontification:

He explained to Creem in 1982, "I wrote 'Won’t Get Fooled Again' as a reaction to all that – ‘Leave me out of it: I don’t think your lot would be any better than the other lot!' All those hippies wandering about thinking the world was going to be different from that day. As a cynical English arsehole, I walked through it all and felt like spitting on the lot of them, and shaking them and trying to make them realise that nothing had changed and nothing was going to change."

Much the same cynicism is appropriate now against Social Justice Warriors who seek to impose tyranny in the name of salvation. There is no worldly Utopia on offer by the WHO, only more degradation of individual liberties and national sovereignties. The WHO did not respond competently, or with integrity, to the Wuhan virus: I for one will not be fooled again. 

The WHO claims inequity prevented poor nations from receiving experimental vaccines. Next pandemic, I volunteer my dose of mRNA to counter that inequity: please provide it to a trans-BIPOC denizen of a developing nation (if they will have it).

And if the WHO wants to be jabbed with my sharpened stick, then “Molon Labe”.